中文|Español|한국어|Português|رسی|Norsk
'The definitions for animal protection and vegetarianism are different in different nations' is one of the most important conclusions of ORIGINS OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS ANIMALS (OAA). Animal Protection is a relatively culturally neutral term for positive attitudes towards animals. Dr Jenia Meng reported in the book that the results of 'Global Attitude to Animals Survey 2007/08' suggest the definitions for animal protection consists of the following components in the participating nations.
Nations | Components of Animal Protection (listed in descending order of relevance, the left most component is the most relevent) |
China (Mainland) | animal experimentation, wildlife protection, anti-cruelty |
Czech | anti-cruelty, animal experimentation, wildlife protection |
Spain | anti-cruelty, animal use, zoo, use of animals for work, |
Ireland | genetic change, anti-cruelty |
Iran | anti-cruelty, wildlife protection |
Korea, South | anti-cruelty, wildlife protection |
Macedonia | wildlife protection, anti-cruelty, genetic change |
Norway | animal experimentation, anti-cruelty |
Portugal | genetic change, anti-cruelty, wildlife protection |
Sweden | anti-cruelty, animal experimentation |
Serbia | animal experimentation, killing, anti-cruelty |
UK | genetic change, anti-cruelty, animal experimentation |
Dr Jenia Meng also reported in the book that the results of 'Global Attitude to Animals Survey 2007/08' suggest that among 12 Participating nations, more vegetarian students in Norway, Portugal, Sweden and the UK consume animal products. In other words, vegetarians in these nations are less restricted. In contrast, vegetarians in Iran were found to be the most restricted. Vegetarians in some nations may not qualify as vegetarians in some other nations.
The detail of the definitions can be found in ORIGINS OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS ANIMALS (OAA).
The text on this webpage is in the public domain
© Earth April, all rights reserved | Email: info@EarthApril.goodeasy.info